Three-dimensional imaging analysis of CAD/CAM custom-milled versus prefabricated allogeneic block remodelling at 6 months and long-term follow-up of dental implants: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: This retrospective cohort study aimed to volumetrically investigate the bone stability rate of prefabricated allogeneic bone blocks (PBB) and computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) custom-milled allogeneic bone blocks (CCBB) for ridge augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated with 20 allografts: 11 CCBB, 9 PBB; 10 in the maxilla and 10 in the mandible. Clinical treatment history and cone beam computed tomography scans before surgery (t0), directly after graft surgery (t1) and after 6 months of healing prior to implant insertion (t2) were evaluated using a three-dimensional evaluation software for absolute bone volume, stability as well as vertical and horizontal bone gain. Furthermore, the inserted implants were analysed for survival, marginal bone loss (MBL) and complications for a mean follow-up period of 43.75 (±33.94) months. RESULTS: A mean absolute volume of 2228.1 mm3 (±1205) was grafted at t1. The bone stability rate was 87.6% (±9.9) for CCBB and 83.0% (±14.5) for PBB. The stability was higher in the maxilla (91.6%) than in the mandible (79.53%). Surgery time of PBB was longer than for CCBB (mean Δ = 52 min). The survival rate of the inserted implants was 100% with a mean MBL of 0.41 mm (±0.37). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of both allograft block designs was equally satisfactory for vertical and horizontal bone grafting prior to implant placement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06027710.

Effect of Luting Materials on the Accuracy of Fit of Zirconia Copings: A Non-Destructive Digital Analysis Method.

The marginal accuracy of fit between prosthetic restorations and abutment teeth represents an essential aspect with regard to long-term clinical success. Since the final gap is also influenced by the luting techniques and materials applied, this study analyzed the accuracy of the fit of single-tooth zirconia copings before and after cementation using different luting materials. Forty plaster dies with a corresponding zirconia coping were manufactured based on a single tooth chamfer preparation. The copings were luted on the plaster dies (n = 10 per luting material) with a zinc phosphate (A), glass-ionomer (B), self-adhesive resin (C), or resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (D). The accuracy of fit for each coping was assessed using a non-destructive digital method. Intragroup statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and intergroup analysis by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Accuracy of fit was significantly different before/after cementation within A (0.033/0.110 µm) and B (0.035/0.118 µm; p = 0.002). A had a significantly increased marginal gap compared to C and D, and B compared to C and D (p ≤ 0.001). Significantly increased vertical discrepancies between A and B versus C and D (p < 0.001) were assessed. Of the materials under investigation, the zinc phosphate cement led to increased vertical marginal discrepancies, whereas the self-adhesive resin cement did not influence the restoration fit.

Stress Distribution within the Peri-Implant Bone for Different Implant Materials Obtained by Digital Image Correlation.

Stress distribution and its magnitude during loading heavily influence the osseointegration of dental implants. Currently, no high-resolution, three-dimensional method of directly measuring these biomechanical processes in the peri-implant bone is available. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of different implant materials on stress distribution in the peri-implant bone. Using the three-dimensional ARAMIS camera system, surface strain in the peri-implant bone area was compared under simulated masticatory forces of 300 N in axial and non-axial directions for titanium implants and zirconia implants. The investigated titanium implants led to a more homogeneous stress distribution than the investigated zirconia implants. Non-axial forces led to greater surface strain on the peri-implant bone than axial forces. Thus, the implant material, implant system, and direction of force could have a significant influence on biomechanical processes and osseointegration within the peri-implant bone.

Impact of Scanbody Geometry and CAD Software on Determining 3D Implant Position.

The implementation of CAD software in the digital production of implant prosthetics stands as a pivotal aspect of clinical dentistry, necessitating high precision in the alignment of implant scanbodies. This study investigates the influence of scanbody geometry and the method of superimposing in CAD software when determining 3D implant position. A standardized titanium model with three bone-level implants was digitized to create reference STL files, and 10 intraoral scans were performed on Medentika and NT-Trading scanbodies. To determine implant position, the generated STL files were imported into the Exocad CAD software and superimposed-automatically and manually-with the scanbody geometries stored within the software's shape library. Position accuracy was determined by a comparison of the 3D-defined scanbody points from the STL matching files with those from the reference STL files. The R statistical software was used for the evaluation of the data. In addition, mixed linear models and a significance level of 0.05 were applied to calculate the p-values. The manual overlay method was significantly more accurate than the automatic overlays for both scanbody types. The Medentika scanbodies showed slightly superior precision compared to the NT-Trading scanbodies. Both scanbody geometry and the type of alignment in the CAD software significantly affect digital workflow accuracy. Manual verification and adjustment of the automatic alignment process are essential for precise implant positioning.

Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?

OBJECTIVES: Artefacts from dental implants in three-dimensional (3D) imaging may lead to incorrect representation of anatomical dimensions and impede virtual planning in navigated implantology. The aim of this study was quantitative assessment of artefacts in 3D STL models from cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT) using different scanning protocols and titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) and zirconium (ZrO2) implant materials. METHODS: Three ZrO2 and three Ti-Zr implants were respectively placed in the mandibles of two fresh human specimens. Before (baseline) and after implant placement, 3D digital imaging scans were performed (10 repetitions per timepoint: voxel size 0.2 mm³ and 0.3 mm³ for CBCT; 80 and 140 kV in MSCT). DICOM data were converted into 3D STL models and evaluated in computer-aided design software. After precise merging of the baseline and post-op models, the surface deviation was calculated, representing the extent of artefacts in the 3D models. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, ZrO2 emitted 36.5-37.3% (±0.6-0.8) artefacts in the CBCT and 39.2-50.2% (±0.5-1.2) in the MSCT models. Ti-Zr implants produced 4.1-7.1% (±0.3-3.0) artefacts in CBCT and 5.4-15.7% (±0.5-1.3) in MSCT. Significantly more artefacts were found in the MSCT vs CBCT models for both implant materials (p < 0.05). Significantly fewer artefacts were visible in the 3D models from scans with higher kilovolts in MSCT and smaller voxel size in CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: Among the four applied protocols, the lowest artefact proportion of ZrO2 and Ti-Zr implants in STL models was observed with CBCT and the 0.3 mm³ voxel size.

Comparison of digital and visual tooth shade selection.

OBJECTIVE: In dental restorations, color determination is very important for achieving esthetic results. The aim of this study was to compare visual shade selection using digital methods and to assess the repeatability of the utilized intraoral scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 31 probands, tooth color was determined on teeth 11, 13, and 16. Shade selection was performed visually by a dentist and digitally using Trios 3 and Cerec Omnicam. Three measurements were performed to determine the repeatability of intraoral scanners. Fleiss' κ was used for statistical evaluation of the repeatability and Cohen's κ was used for comparison of methods. RESULTS: The visual method showed only slight agreement with Trios 3 (Cohen's κ: 0.198) and Cerec Omnicam (Cohen's κ: 0.115). Moderate agreement was found between Trios 3 and Cerec Omnicam (Cohen's κ: 0.452). In terms of repeatability, Trios 3 scored higher overall than Cerec Omnicam (Fleiss' κ: 0.612 vs. 0.474). CONCLUSION: Intraoral scanners can facilitate the workflow in clinical practice. They are a good supplement for color determination, but should additionally be confirmed by the visual method. Clinical significance: The use of digital instruments is increasingly being preferred over conventional treatments. Therefore, it is essential to continuously improve the accuracy of intraoral scanners for color selection in order to offer an alternative to visual methods.

Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study.

The aim of this study was to compare the trueness of complete- and partial-arch impressions obtained using conventional impression materials and intraoral scanners in vivo. Full-arch impressions were taken using polyether and polyvinylsiloxane. Gypsum casts were digitized using a laboratory scanner (IM, AF). Casts obtained from polyether impressions were also scanned using an industrial blue light scanner to construct 3D reference models. Intraoral scanning was performed using CEREC Omnicam (CO) and Trios 3 (TR). Surface matching software (Atos Professional) enabled to determine the mean deviations (mean distances) from the reference casts. Statistically significant discrepancies were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The mean distance for trueness ranged from 0.005 mm (TR) to 0.023 mm (IM) for the full arch, from 0.001 mm (CO) to 0.068 mm (IM) for the anterior segment, and from 0.019 mm (AF) to 0.042 mm (IM) for the posterior segment. Comparing the anterior vs. the posterior segment, significantly less deviations were observed for anterior with CO (p < 0.001) and TR (p < 0.001). Full-arch comparisons revealed significant differences between AF vs. IM (p = 0.014), IM vs. CO (p = 0.002), and IM vs. TR (p = 0.001). Full-arch trueness was comparable when using Affinis and the two intraoral scanners CEREC Omnicam and Trios 3. The digital impression devices yielded higher local deviations within the complete arch. Digital impressions of the complete arch are a suitable and reliable alternative to conventional impressions. However, they should be used with caution in the posterior region.Trial registration: Registration number at the German Clinical Trial Register (04.02.2022): DRKS00027988 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/ ).

Investigation of the palatal soft tissue volume: a 3D virtual analysis for digital workflows and presurgical planning.

BACKGROUND: In mucogingival and implant surgery, an autologous soft tissue graft from the palate is the gold standard for reconstructing missing keratinised soft tissue and volume. Previously, presurgical measurements of the graft harvesting site were described with two-dimensional (2D) linear measurements. The present observational clinical study aimed to evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) measurement method for determining the present palatal soft tissue volume for each patient individually. METHODS: Pre-existing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 20 patients were converted into 3D Standard Tessellation Language models of the bone surface. Intraoral impressions of the maxilla were taken and digitised to visualise the gingival surface. The resulting virtual models of bone (reference value) and gingival (actual value) surfaces were merged, with tooth surfaces used for registration. The region between the central incisors and the hard palate was subdivided into 5 regions of interest (ROIs). The distance between palatal bone and gingival surface was analysed both volumetrically and linearly, and the results were statistically evaluated for the ROIs. RESULTS: The average gingival surface area on the palate was 19.1 cm2, and the mean volume was 58.2 cm3 (± 16.89). Among the ROIs, the mean linear value was highest in the most distal region, from the second molar to the hard palate (4.0 ± 1.09 mm) and lowest in the canine region (1.9 ± 0.63 mm). For mean distance, significant differences were found for the anterior palate and the most posterior palate in comparison with all other ROIs (p < 0.01). The volume measurements also declined significantly and steadily between the posterior (1.9 ± 1.0 cm3) and anterior palates (0.4 ± 0.2 cm3). CONCLUSIONS: By merging digital data, palatal soft tissue could be quantified virtually. The results were reliable and comparable to previous findings with linear measurement methods. This 3D soft tissue volume analysis method fully exploited the diagnostic potential of data that are frequently collected for presurgical planning in oral surgery (i.e., CBCT + surface scans). This evaluation method might be useful for volumetric and linear measurements in other applications in anatomy and for determining palatal soft tissue dimensions in the planning stage before surgical interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This observational clinical trial was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register, reference number: DRKS00023918.

Ten-year clinical performance of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures.

BACKGROUND: With the constantly increasing demand for metal-free solutions in dental therapy, numerous ceramic restorations have found their way into everyday clinical practice, but long-term clinical data are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate three- and four-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior region made of zirconium dioxide frameworks veneered with feldspathic porcelain after 10 years in clinical use. METHODS: Based on the two studies published in 2009 and 2012, in which the all-ceramic FDPs were evaluated after 3 and 5 years of function, a clinical evaluation of a total of 17 restorations after 10 years with regard to their condition and long-term stability was carried out in the course of this study. The restorations were fabricated using feldspathic ceramic-veneered, yttria-stabilised, tetragonal zirconium dioxide as the framework material. The data collection was based on modified CDA criteria and included, for example, the shape, shade, surface condition and the success and survival rates of the restorations. RESULTS: The all-ceramic prostheses embodied excellent biocompatibility and colour reproduction. As a result of an increased incidence of chipping fractures, the success rate was 60%. The survival rate, however, was 88.2%, as 2 of the 17 restorations were lost. CONCLUSION: All-ceramic concepts for FDP constructions in the posterior region achieved satisfactory results in terms of durability after 10 years. The main problem was chipping, as has been generally recognised. Nevertheless, the materials were characterised by excellent aesthetics and biocompatibility, which ultimately makes them a good alternative to conventional restorative options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in DRKS-German Clinical Trials Register with the register number DRKS00021743.

Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Compared with the frequent investigations into the accuracy of digital intraoral scans, studies analyzing digital determinations of jaw relationships based on intraoral scans are scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to present an optical 3-dimensional method for analyzing deviations in static occlusion and to compare the accuracy of conventional and digital interocclusal registrations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Frasaco jaw model was duplicated, articulated, and scanned with a high-precision industrial scanner, and the data were stored in a virtual standard tessellation language (STL) format, which served as the reference model. Fifteen paired mandibular and maxillary models were scanned with a digital intraoral scanner in the completely digital workflow (IOS group). Forty-five paired gypsum casts were poured from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions and associated with 2 different PVS registration materials. These casts were digitized with a laboratory scanner and grouped as follows (n=15/group): PVS group, conventional Futar D interocclusal record; sPVS group, conventional Futar Scan interocclusal record; and the AIR group, partially digital antagonist scan of the Futar Scan interocclusal record. The axes (X, Y, Z, and XYZ) of each paired model were aligned to those of the reference model by 3-dimensional superimposition, and deviations were calculated. To determine the ideal zero position, a best-fit over the mandibular teeth between the reference model and the actual model was estimated. Next, a second best-fit was determined between the maxillary models to determine the actual position of the mandibular model. The different registration methods were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05). RESULTS: In the IOS group, the interocclusal registration caused a mandibular deviation of 0.05 ±0.04 mm (mean ±standard deviation). This fit was better than those of conventional registrations with inserted interocclusal registration materials (PVS group and sPVS group), which caused mean z-axis deviations of 0.41 ±0.46 mm and 0.44 ±0.32 mm (P<.001), with the deviations leading to elevation of the mandibular model. The partially digital workflow with a scannable registration material (AIR group) showed significantly larger deviations in the x-axis (0.15 ±0.08 mm; P=.042) compared with the IOS group. No significant difference was observed in the total deviation between the IOS and the AIR groups. Both groups showed significantly smaller deviations than the conventional registration methods (P<.001 for the IOS group and P=.023 for the AIR group). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with maxillary and mandibular alignment using conventional interocclusal registration materials, digital interocclusal registrations showed greater accuracy in evaluating complete jaw models and can be recommended for clinical use. Additionally, the partially digital workflow with an antagonist scan of the interocclusal record provided acceptable results.

Comparison of Digital and Conventional Impressions Based on the 3D Fit of Crowns.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoral scanners, scannable impression materials, and conventional methods for impression-taking with regard to precision and accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten impressions per technique were initially taken from a cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) master model (chamfer preparation for the maxillary right first molar) for fabricating Co-Cr crown copings. The test specimens, their respective metal master model, and the plaster casts from the conventional impressions were then digitized with the light-optical Atos Triple Scanner. The fit of the dental crown copings was measured in two and three dimensions using computer-aided design software. Global differences between the methods were determined using Kruskal-Wallis test, and pairwise comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level was set at .05. RESULTS: The 2D analysis showed that the average absolute marginal distance of the crown copings was 0.026 mm when fabricated with the digital impression method and 0.038 mm when fabricated with the conventional method (P = .028). However, the 3D analysis revealed that the conventional group had a smaller marginal gap (0.028 mm) compared to the digital group (0.06 mm; P = .015). CONCLUSION: This study showed that, in the field of single-crown prosthetics, digital impressions and the use of scannable impression material could serve as alternatives to conventional methods in the future.

Inner marginal strength of CAD/CAM materials is not affected by machining protocol.

PURPOSE: Here we aimed to compare two machining strategies regarding the marginal strength of CAD/CAM materials using a hoop-strength test in model sphero-cylindrical dental crowns, coupled with finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five CAD/CAM materials indicated for single posterior crowns were selected, including a lithium disilicate (IPS e.max® CAD), a lithium (di)silicate (Suprinity® PC), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic scaffold (Enamic®), and two indirect resin composites (Grandio® Blocs and Lava™ Ultimate). A sphero-cylindrical model crown was built on CAD Software onto a geometrical abutment and machined using a Cerec MC XL system according to the two available protocols: rough-fast and fine-slow. Specimens were fractured using a novel hoop-strength test and analyzed using the finite element method to obtain the inner marginal strength. Data were evaluated using Weibull statistics. RESULTS: Machining strategy did not affect the marginal strength of any restorative material tested here. Ceramic materials showed a higher density of chippings in the outer margin, but this did not reduce inner marginal strength. IPS e.max® CAD showed the statistically highest marginal strength, and Enamic® and Lava™ Ultimate were the lowest. Grandio® Blocs showed higher performance than Suprinity® PC. CONCLUSIONS: The rough-fast machining strategy available in Cerec MC XL does not degrade the marginal strength of the evaluated CAD/CAD materials when compared to its fine-fast machining strategy. Depending on the material, resin composites have the potential to perform better than some glass-ceramic materials.

Wear of feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia posterior FPDs after 10 years.

BACKGROUND: The abrasion behavior of various ceramics is rarely investigated, though it is relevant for the clinical success of such restorations. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the wear of feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconium oxide frameworks over a period of at least 10 years. METHODS: The abrasion behavior of 15 bridge constructions from 15 different participants was examined after a period of 3, 5, and 10 years using plaster models, which were then subjected to a scanning process on the Atos II industrial scanner and digitized for three-dimensional evaluation of the abrasion by the corresponding software (ATOS Professional 7.6). The individual post-examination models were compared to the baseline model and deviations calculated in the sense of the largest, punctual loss of material in millimeters ("minimal distance"), the average abrasion in millimeters ("mean distance"), and the volume decrease in cubic millimeters ("integrated distance"). Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon sign rank test or mixed regression models. Multiple testing was considered by Benjamini-Hochberg correction. The significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: We found steadily increasing wear of the ceramic. The average volume decrease was significant (P < 0.001) at 3 years and 10 years (- 3.25 mm3 and - 8.11 mm3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the rate of volume loss in feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia frameworks in the posterior region increases significantly over time. An increasing frequency of parameters was observed, particularly in the second half of the study period. However, the use of this class of materials can be considered clinically acceptable. Trial registration This study is registered in DRKS - German Clinical Trials Register with the register number DRKS00021743. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021743.

The occlusal wear of ceramic fixed dental prostheses: 3-Year results in a randomized controlled clinical trial with split-mouth design.

OBJECTIVES: This study's hypothesis was to evaluate differences of the occlusal wear rate for monolithically fabricated lithium disilicate and hand-veneered zirconia crowns in-vivo. Furthermore, a comparison of the materials' clinical performance according to CDA criteria was investigated. METHODS: A total number of 15 patients in the need of full-coverage ceramic fixed dental prosthesis on molars were treated with two crowns each (n = 30), randomly assigned on the contralateral sides made of monolithic IPS e.max CAD (n = 15) and IPS e.max Ceram hand-veneered zirconia (n = 15). Clinical examination was conducted, silicone impressions were taken and plaster models fabricated at the day of crown insertion (baseline) and after 1, 2 and 3 years. The abrasion rate was digitally investigated: after model digitization with the industrial scanner Atos II, each follow-up model was superimposed with the baseline model. The wear was evaluated as the difference between two scans in terms of maximum vertical loss [mm], average decrease [mm] and volume loss [mm³]. For statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed and significance was set to less than 0.05. RESULTS: IPS e.max CAD crowns showed a volume loss of -0.68 mm³ after three years, while IPS e.max Ceram hand-veneered zirconia crowns showed a volumetric wear of -0.75 mm³ at the same point of time. However, no significant differences were found between both materials regarding the 3 evaluated wear parameters. The survival rate for both materials was 100 % and the clinical performance outcome was good to excellent. CONCLUSION: The two investigated materials for ceramic fixed dental prostheses showed similar wear rates and clinical performance over an in-vivo use of 3 years. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Ceramic restorations are subject to occlusal wear over time due to the natural masticatory process. Both monolithic lithium disilicate and glass-ceramic veneered zirconia copings showed clinically satisfactory results over 3 years in-situ. In terms of abrasion, they are equally well suited for clinical use.

Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.

PURPOSE: Sufficient data are not currently available on how the various geometries of scan bodies and different scan strategies affect the quality of digital impressions of implants. The purpose of this study was to present new data on these two topics and give clinicians a basis for decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A titanium master model containing three Nobelreplace Select™ implants (Nobelbiocare Services AG, Zurich, Switzerland) was digitized using an ATOS industrial noncontact scanner. Digitization was repeated three times with different types of scan bodies integrated into the implants: ELOS A/S, nt-trading GmbH, and TEAMZIEREIS GmbH. These three scans served as virtual master models. The titanium master model was then scanned with the TRIOS3© digital intraoral scanner (ELOS A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), which was used for two different scanning strategies. Strategy A was a one-step procedure that included both the titanium master model and the integrated scan bodies. Strategy B comprised two steps. First, a digital overlay was performed with a scan of the titanium master model without integrated scan bodies. A second scan was performed with the titanium master model and integrated scan bodies. By repeating both strategies 10 times for each type of scan body, 60 scans were generated and the corresponding standard tessellation language data sets overlaid with the corresponding virtual master model. Deviations in the resulting superimpositions were calculated and evaluated separately in the individual axes (x, y, z) and in three-dimensional space (Euclidean distance). Statistical evaluation was performed using the R-project software. Level of significance was determined at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: With regard to the geometry of the scan bodies, strategy A significantly influenced the accuracy of the digital implant impression in regards to Euclidean distance (p = 0.003). No significant difference was found for strategy B in this context. Comparing the two scan strategies revealed that strategy A achieved significantly higher accuracy overall (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The quality of digital intraoral impressions seems to be influenced by both the geometry of the scan body and the scan strategy. For clinical practice, the one-step scan strategy seems beneficial. Furthermore, the scan bodies of ELOS A/S showed a potential clinical advantage.

Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular deformation during mouth opening.

AIM: Deformation of the mandible presents a major challenge for many dentists, both in conventional prosthetic supraconstructions and in complex implant restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) deformation of the mandible in vivo with scannable impression material and an industrial optical scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, 20 female and 20 male subjects were examined. In each case, two impressions were made with polyvinylsiloxane: one with the mouth slightly open, and a second with the mouth wide open. The impressions were digitized with an industrial optical scanner and transformed into a virtual model. The two corresponding models were digitally superimposed over all the teeth. Then, an individual local coordinate system was assigned to each individual tooth. Subsequently, a best-fit procedure was performed for each individual tooth. Finally, the open- and closed-mouth models were compared by calculating the differences and rotations in the individual axes. This procedure was performed individually for each tooth. RESULTS: The mean deviations in the x-, y-, and z-coordinates ranged from 0.011 mm at the canines to 0.232 mm at the molars. Larger discrepancies were observed in the female subjects than in the male subjects; however, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that the posterior region of the mandible deformed when the mouth was maintained in a wide-open position. Therefore, this position should be avoided when performing dental impressions. Moreover, potential negative consequences of this mandibular deformation should be taken into consideration when planning wide-span fixed dental restorations.

Impact of voxel size and scan time on the accuracy of three-dimensional radiological imaging data from cone-beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) radiological imaging plays an important role in surgical planning used in modern dentistry. The aim of this study was to optimize imaging parameters with a special focus on voxel size and scan time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A virtual 3D master model of a macerated human skull was generated using an industrial optical noncontact white light scanner. The skull was X-rayed with cone-beam computed tomography that was applied using different settings for voxel size and acquisition time (voxel edge length of 0.3 mm, scan times 4.8 s and 8.9 s; voxel edge length of 0.2 mm, scan times 14.7 s and 26.9 s). The scan was repeated 10 times at each setting. The CBCT scans were converted into 3D virtual models (actual value), which were superimposed with the 3D master model (reference value) to detect absolute differences. RESULTS: The mean value of deviation increased with increasing voxel size and decreasing scan time. For a voxel edge length of 0.3 mm, the mean values of deviation were 0.33 mm and 0.22 mm with scan times of 4.8 s and 8.9 s, respectively. For a voxel edge length of 0.2 mm, the mean deviations were 0.16 mm and 0.14 mm with scan times of 14.7 s and 26.9 s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When using small voxel sizes, the scan time does not have a significant impact on image accuracy and therefore the scan time can be shortened. However, for larger voxel sizes, shorter scan times can lead to increased inaccuracy.

Peri-implant Bone Loss of Tissue-Level and Bone-Level Implants in the Esthetic Zone with Gingival Biotype Analysis.

PURPOSE: The esthetic outcome of dental implants can be compromised when some degree of bone loss occurs around the implant. This may particularly affect the tissue-level (TL) design. Therefore, bone-level (BL) design implants may be preferable if a natural emergence profile is important. Notwithstanding the implant design, the gingival biotype has been identified as a crucial factor in the stability of crestal bone. The objective of this study was to investigate bone loss in patients with different gingival biotypes at TL and BL implant sites in the esthetic zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 41 patients, 20 TL and 22 BL implant procedures were carried out. Intraoral radiographs of all of the 42 sites were taken immediately after implant insertion as well as during the follow-up examination. The analysis of bone height was conducted using a computerized technique. The TRAN method was used to determine the gingival biotype. RESULTS: After a mean in situ period of 4.9 years in the TL group, 12 implants with a thick biotype had a mean bone loss of 0.21 mm (SD: 0.43 mm). The eight implants with a thin biotype had a loss of 0.05 mm (SD: 0.47 mm; P = .31). After a mean in situ period of 1.9 years, the 14 BL sites with a thick biotype showed a mean bone change of -0.03 mm (SD: 0.38 mm). In the eight implants with a thin biotype, a change of +0.09 mm (SD: 0.32 mm; P = .84) was noted. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the obtained results did not reveal a dependency of bone height on implant design or on gingival biotype. However, prior to choosing an implant design, it may nevertheless be beneficial to screen for transparent soft tissues, where the BL design offers a more natural emergence profile. For this purpose, the TRAN method is clearly the fastest and easiest.

Long-Term Esthetic Outcome of Tissue-Level and Bone-Level Implants in the Anterior Maxilla.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the esthetic outcome of tissue-level (TL) and bone-level (BL) implants that had been placed as single implants in the anterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2008, patients were treated using TL implants (Straumann). From 2008 until 2012, patients received the newly developed BL implant (Straumann). All patients with a single anterior maxillary implant who came to check-ups regularly were contacted and invited to take part in the study. Standardized photographs were taken to conduct the evaluation. Five observers analyzed the esthetic outcome using the pink esthetic score (PES). For the purpose of statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied. Interobserver reliability was evaluated with Krippendorff's alpha. RESULTS: Forty-six patients agreed to take part in the study. The study comprised 10 immediate (TL = 6, BL = 4), 21 early (TL = 6, BL = 15), and 15 delayed implantations (TL = 11, BL = 4). All implant sites were simultaneously augmented. The prosthetic restorations were delivered 6 to 24 weeks after implant placement in the TL group and 10 to 14 weeks after implant placement in the BL group. Esthetic evaluation was performed after a mean period of 9.5 years for TL implants (range: 5.5 to 12.0) and 3.7 years for BL implants (range: 2.6 to 7.1). The overall PES was 8.49 (SD: 2.35) for TL implants and 9.29 (SD: 1.90) for BL implants (P = .37). Comparison of single parameters was between P = .24 and P = .83, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two implant types. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, it can be stated that both implant designs showed comparably satisfying esthetic results.

Hygroscopic expansion of self-adhesive resin cements and the integrity of all-ceramic crowns.

OBJECTIVE: Low pH neutralization and subsequent remnant hydrophilicity can lead to hygroscopic expansion of self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) after water storage. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of hygroscopic expansion of SARCs, used as luting and partial core build-up material, on integrity and cement gap thickness increase of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. METHODS: Human third molars (n=48) were prepared and anatomical all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns were manufactured (VITABLOCS Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik). Crowns internal surfaces were HF etched and silanized. The prepared teeth with their respective crowns were divided into 6 groups (n=8). In groups 1, 3 and 5 the coronal dentin was removed to simulate a partial core build-up. Groups 1 and 2 were luted with iCEM (Heraeus Kulzer), 3 and 4 with RelyX Unicem 2 Automix (3M), 5 and 6 with Variolink Esthetic DC (Ivoclar Vivadent). All specimens were dual cured and stored in distilled water at 37°C. Crown integrity was controlled at baseline and in regular intervals until 180 days. Cement gap thickness was measured using an optical 3D scanner (ATOS Triple scan, GOM) at baseline and after 180 days. Crown integrity was statistically analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and cement gap thickness increase using two-way ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS: After 180 days storage, crack formation was observed in all specimens of group 1 (mean survival time of 85.5 days), in one specimen of group 2 and in two specimens of group 4. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant interaction between material type and build-up on cement gap size increase for iCEM. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limits of this study, the application of SARCs with low pH neutralization as partial build-up material under CAD/CAM crowns is not recommended for clinical use.